Five-step guided walkthrough
Watch a healthy run become an evidenced incident.
The workflow finishes successfully. The expected business outcome does not. Guard finds the discrepancy without using real customer data.
Run looks healthy
Every technical step reports success.
The trigger is accepted, the workflow completes, and the CRM request returns HTTP 200.The evidence package
Every conclusion stays attached to a signal.
No invented root cause. No inferred financial impact. Unknown fields remain unknown until evidence exists.
Incident record
Failure type, detection method, time to detect, impact boundary and recurrence risk.
Recovery proof
What changed, who approved it, and which terminal signal confirms the workflow recovered.
Prevention rule
A checkable rule that can detect the same pattern before it becomes tribal knowledge.
Customer-ready reporting
The incident becomes a clear reliability story.
Guard connects workflow health, incident evidence and recovery history in a report an agency can use with its client.
- Executive summary
- Reliability trend
- Incident and recovery evidence
- Known limitations and open actions
September reliability review
Close the CRM owner-assignment gap and verify the repaired terminal state before replay.
End of synthetic walkthrough
Guard did not stop at “the workflow ran.”
It checked the outcome, found the missing state, preserved the evidence and recommended the next safe action.
SYNTHETIC / NO CUSTOMER DATA · NO PUBLIC SIGNUP